2024

IVALUA NOW
Procurement Reimagined

May 22-23
Miami, FL

Register Now

Blog »

Thought Leadership » Successfully Launching a Digital Procurement Transformation

Successfully Launching a Digital Procurement Transformation

|

|

by Alex Saric

In an earlier post, I wrote about the importance and overall success factors involved in digitally transforming Procurement. Virtually every Procurement organization has started or is planning to start this journey, given its importance to meeting Procurement’s ever growing list of objectives. 

Yet far too many struggle. 82% of respondents to a recent Forrester survey on Executing a Successful Procurement Transformation had switched their technology or plan to switch during that transformation, a costly effort in terms of budget and time. Interestingly, the challenges encountered differ significantly based on the stage of transformation. Therefore, I’d like to now take a deeper look into the success factors at each stage in a 3 part series.

Let’s start at the top. As many explorers will tell you, the hardest step on any great journey is actually the first. It is hence unsurprising that many organizations struggle getting started. Various obstacles block progress. The Forrester study found the top two challenges for beginners were lack of executive support and insufficient budget (for people and technology). This makes sense as the laws of physics apply to large organizations as well as particles, and “an object at rest stays at rest.” Breaking this inertia, especially for something that is as significant an effort as digital transformation, is rarely easy.

Executive support is key and directly correlated to obtaining sufficient budget. There is a simple, but not an easy, answer here – leadership. The most successful transformations I have seen are all spearheaded by a dynamic leader. The one tried and true approach is for Procurement leaders to build and sell the business case. There certainly is sufficient data to support such a case, and plenty of examples of the benefits. The ROI is overwhelming. For example, Piramal Glass saving an average of 19% on indirect costs in each of the first 4 years of their transformation. An above average result but not a rare one, at least not with the right strategy.

Executive support and budget are challenges, but ones leaders MUST step up to. If your CFO/CEO respond better to analytical business cases, build one. If they respond to examples find the most relevant ones. If the fear of falling behind competitors pushes them to act, find out what your competitors are doing, or take Forrester’s new self-assessment to have a 3rd party assessment of how you stack up against competitors. Or point out the cost to the organization of a recent problem that could not be addressed due to lack of digital maturity.

One or more of these are almost always sufficient to win executive support and associated budget, with the right engagement. Leaders must learn what works. And don’t forget the best, and free, source of support for whatever approach you decide on – technology vendors. They want to sell you their software and have reams of examples, reports and data they are more than happy to share to help you make your case, at no cost to you. Make them work for that sale.

Many organizations do get past these challenges but then struggle realizing the promised value. Besides hurting the business, such a result is a particularly poor way to establish your credibility and build the case for further investment. Some of this comes down to not having organizational support aligned. Be sure to engage IT early and ensure you have their support, plus prepare your own team. Doing so will maximize the chance of a successful technology deployment.

Properly evaluating technology is also essential. You want technology that can deliver significant value quickly. That means it must deploy in a reasonable time, integrate well, have strong capabilities and be easily adopted (by users AND suppliers). Be careful of being unknowingly forced into permanent trade-offs. A common one is deploying quickly versus having flexibility. Insist on both. If you can deploy the software quickly but only with a solution that lacks flexibility to meet unique or changing requirements (do you really think you know exactly what your requirements will be next year?), you are very likely to find yourself at a roadblock. You certainly won’t maximize value.

Pre-packaged best practices are great, but not if they are all generic. Many best practices are indeed common and you want those pre-packaged as much as possible, but some vary, due to industry or your unique organization. Hospitals where surgical products are used BEFORE being ordered have very different workflow requirements from others. Banks that face unique compliance requirements need software that supports those. Beyond industry, a decentralized organization facing local regulations and teams has different requirements from a centralized one. The list goes on and on and don’t underestimate the importance of the small percent of unique requirements, or overestimate the ability of specific technology to meet them. Industry solutions can meet many unique requirements quickly. Software that is configurable lets you meet and prevent you from becoming a slave to your vendor’s roadmap, pleading for critical enhancement requests.

As I mentioned in my earlier post, details matter when it comes to technology. Dig into them. For example, it seems logical to assume ERP vendor solutions integrate most easily and seamlessly with the core ERP systems. In reality, independent vendors often integrate better, especially when multiple ERP instances exist and certainly when more than 1 ERP system is involved. Just look at the cautions noted for the ERP providers in the latest Gartner Magic Quadrant for P2P suites.

A large supplier network sounds like a ticket to quick supplier onboarding, but in reality the vast majority of suppliers always need to be onboarded and the real success factor is ease of onboarding and lack of fees, limits, conditions.

Lastly, always keep in mind your end goal. Driving quick wins and proving the case for further investment is key when getting started, but what will maximize value over time is being able to quickly progress in your transformation, to achieve best-in-class procurement, and eventually go beyond to build a true competitive advantage. If companies effectively plan for the challenges at each stage of transformation from the start, they can accelerate their journey.

My next post will look at key factors in rapidly progressing to best-in-class. In the meantime, if you’d like an objective perspective on your own procurement maturity and how you can accelerate your journey, take the free Forrester Self Assessment.

Blog - Alex Saric - Chief Marketing Officer

Alex Saric

Chief Marketing Officer

Alex has spent over 15 years of his career evangelizing Spend Management, shaping its evolution and working closely with hundreds of customers to support their Digital Transformation journeys. As CMO at Ivalua, Alex leads overall marketing strategy and thought leadership programs. Alex also spent 12 years at Ariba, first building and running the spend analytics business as General Manager. He then built and led Ariba’s international marketing team until successful acquisition by SAP, transitioning to lead business network marketing globally. Earlier, Alex was a founding member of Zeborg (acquired by Emptoris)where he developed vertical Procurement applications. He began his career in the U.S. Cavalry, leading tank and scout platoons through 2 combat deployments. Alex holds a B.S. in Economics from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and an international M.B.A. from INSEAD.

You can connect with Alex on Linkedin

You May Also Like

Ready to Realize the Possibilities?